runthetic logorunthetic
Sign in
Back to questions
Training7 min read

Subjective vs Objective Pace in Running: Which Should You Trust?

Understanding the difference between how fast a run feels and how fast it actually is—and why both matter for smarter training.

Subjective vs Objective Pace in Running

Ask ten runners how fast they’re running and you might get ten different answers—even if they’re all moving at the same speed. That’s because pace in running can be measured two ways: objectively (numbers from a watch or treadmill) and subjectively (how hard the effort feels). Understanding the difference between these two concepts—and how they interact—is key to training effectively and avoiding common mistakes.

What Is Objective Pace?

Objective pace is the measurable, numerical side of running. It includes:

  • Pace (e.g. minutes per kilometre or mile)
  • Speed
  • Heart rate
  • Power (where available)

These metrics are attractive because they feel precise and reliable. A watch doesn’t get tired, emotional, or distracted—it simply reports data. Objective pace is especially useful for:

  • Tracking long-term progress
  • Comparing workouts over time
  • Executing race-specific pacing strategies
  • Structured interval training

However, objective metrics have limitations. GPS pace can fluctuate, heart rate can lag behind effort, and none of these numbers fully capture how stressed your body actually is on a given day.

What Is Subjective Pace?

Subjective pace refers to how fast or hard a run feels. This is often described using Rate of Perceived Exertion (RPE)—a scale that typically runs from very easy to maximal effort.

Subjective pace accounts for internal sensations such as:

  • Breathing rate
  • Muscle fatigue
  • Mental strain
  • Overall comfort or discomfort

Research has shown that perceived exertion closely reflects physiological stress, integrating signals from muscles, the cardiovascular system, and the brain itself. Borg’s original RPE scale has been widely validated as a meaningful indicator of exercise intensity, even without external measurements (Borg, 1982).

Why Objective and Subjective Pace Often Disagree

Most runners have experienced days where an “easy” pace feels surprisingly hard—or race pace feels effortless. This mismatch happens because objective pace doesn’t exist in a vacuum. Factors that influence subjective effort include:

  • Heat and humidity
  • Altitude
  • Fatigue and sleep quality
  • Stress and hydration
  • Terrain and wind

For example, heart rate and perceived effort both increase in hot conditions, even when pace remains unchanged. Studies show that thermal stress elevates cardiovascular strain, making a pace that’s normally easy feel significantly harder (González-Alonso et al., 1999).

The Risk of Ignoring Subjective Pace

Relying only on objective pace can lead to problems:

  • Easy runs become too hard, reducing recovery
  • Fatigue accumulates unnoticed
  • Injury risk increases
  • Training becomes less adaptable

Research on endurance training intensity distribution consistently shows that successful runners spend a large proportion of training at genuinely low intensities. Perceived effort is often a better guide than pace or heart rate alone for staying in the correct zone (Seiler & Tønnessen, 2009).

The Risk of Ignoring Objective Pace

On the other hand, running entirely by feel has its own drawbacks:

  • Effort can drift upward without awareness
  • Race-specific pacing is harder to learn
  • Progress is difficult to quantify
  • Emotional state can distort perception

Objective data provides an anchor, helping runners understand what “easy,” “steady,” or “hard” truly looks like in numbers—especially over longer training blocks.

Why the Best Runners Use Both

Rather than choosing between subjective and objective pace, experienced runners combine them.

A simple framework looks like this:

  • Easy runs: Guided primarily by feel, verified by pace/heart rate
  • Quality workouts: Anchored by objective targets, adjusted by feel
  • Races: Planned with objective pacing, executed with subjective awareness

Over time, runners develop a strong internal sense of pace. Studies suggest that perceived exertion becomes more accurate with training experience, making subjective pacing an increasingly reliable tool (Eston, 2012).

Practical Takeaway

Objective pace tells you what you are doing.
Subjective pace tells you what it’s costing you.

Ignoring either one limits your training. By paying attention to both how fast you’re running and how it feels, you gain flexibility, consistency, and better long-term results—especially when conditions or fatigue make rigid pacing unrealistic.

References

  • Borg, G. (1982). Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 14(5), 377–381.
  • González-Alonso, J., Teller, C., Andersen, S. L., Jensen, F. B., Hyldig, T., & Nielsen, B. (1999). Influence of body temperature on the development of fatigue during prolonged exercise in the heat. Journal of Applied Physiology, 86(3), 1032–1039.
  • Seiler, S., & Tønnessen, E. (2009). Intervals, thresholds, and long slow distance: the role of intensity and duration in endurance training. Sportscience, 13, 32–53.
  • Eston, R. (2012). Use of ratings of perceived exertion in sports. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 7(2), 175–182.